One of the many penalties that an individual could face for conviction of a sex crime is sex offender registration.
It is important that you have skillful representation on your side that can provide you with aggressive legal assistance to fight the accusations that you are facing and to pursue a favorable outcome in your situation. A., we have the experience that you need and we have handled numerous cases involving sex crimes and other violent crimes in the past.
Whether you are facing charges for child pornography or rape, you can count on our firm to fight for your rights.
Our Memphis criminal defense attorneys have more than 20 years of experience in handling various criminal defense cases, we understand the severity of your situation, and we are dedicated to providing our clients with the legal assistance that they need.
We are tough and experienced litigators who incorporate science into our defense strategies so that we can comprehensively investigate a case for flaws and errors.
We pursue a favorable outcome through aggressive defense of your case, while working behind the scenes to obtain a case dismissal.
Let our firm work for you; contact a Memphis criminal lawyer today!
In the United Kingdom, the Violent and Sex Offender Register (Vi SOR) is a database of records of those required to register with the police under the Sexual Offences Act 2003 (the 2003 Act), those jailed for more than 12 months for violent offences, and those thought to be at risk of offending.
In response to a Freedom of Information request in 2009, for example, Greater Manchester Police reported that of 16 people in their area placed on Vi SOR since 2007 on their initiative and not as a result of a relevant conviction, four (25%) had clean criminal records.
It used to be managed by the National Policing Improvement Agency of the Home Office, but this was replaced by the National Crime Agency on 7 October 2013, as a feature of the Crime and Courts Act 2013, which also formally abolished the NPIA.
Notification periods for offenders sentenced under the 2003 Act are as follows: Finite notification periods are halved if the person is under 18 when convicted or cautioned.
In April 2010 the United Kingdom Supreme Court ruled that indefinite notification requirements contained in section 82(1) of the 2003 Act were a breach of individual human rights as they were disproportionate.